The complete guide

Chapter 5 of 9

Their Next Chapter is a site for parents and teens working out what comes after high school. If you're new here, start with how it works.

Talking about it without breaking the relationship

Your teen is stuck, and pushing keeps them stuck. This chapter is about the kind of talking that helps them get unstuck and own the choice, whatever it turns out to be.

The short version

A stuck teen can hear "So what's the plan?" as a test, so ask questions that hand the deciding back.

Open the first talk one-on-one, say the decision is theirs, and ask how they'd like you to help.

How you react shapes whether they tell you again: thank them, say back what you heard, and name the feeling before fixing anything.

If a talk goes badly, come down first. If you were part of it going wrong, apologize plainly and stop there.

Your job has moved from manager to consultant. Hold firm on a small step and a check-in date, not on the path.

Why pressing a stuck teen makes it worse

When a teen can't decide, "so what's the plan" doesn't pull an answer loose. It adds weight to a load that's already heavy. The main work of this age is becoming their own person, so a pointed question about their future can land as a test they're failing on the spot, and they shut it down to protect themselves. Press harder and they start defending the non-decision itself, because now the pressing is what they're reacting to, and the choice drops out of the talk altogether.

Studies of teens and their parents point the other way: feeling supported at home went with more career exploring, and pressure or interference went with more trouble deciding (Dietrich and Kracke, 2009; Ahn and colleagues, 2023). A struggling teen needs more room to explore, not a tighter deadline, so the questions that help are the ones that hand the deciding back. "What would you want out of the next year if no one were watching?" leaves the answer with them. "Isn't the local program the practical move?" has already decided for them, and they can hear it. "What felt good about this week?" or "What are you into lately that surprised you?" asks about them rather than about your plan for them. Then follow where they go instead of steering back to your version.

Once your teen has said what's hard, one question turns the talk forward: "Say this got sorted out. What's the first thing you'd notice?" In a randomized study, 204 Spanish university students wrote about a real problem, then answered either questions like that one or questions about how long the problem had lasted and why. The forward-looking questions built more confidence about handling the problem and turned up more steps the students could take (Neipp and colleagues, 2016). The students answered in writing, alone, with no parent involved. Asking how long it's been going on and why didn't hurt their mood much, so those questions are fine now and then. They built less confidence and fewer next steps, though, so don't make them the main ones.

A study of eighth graders supplies another set of questions: "Next year, what do you expect you'll be doing? What do you want to avoid? Is there anything you're doing now toward it?" Students whose hopes and fears for next year came with something concrete they were already doing had better grades by spring, after allowing for their fall grades. The effect was small, and the students were much younger than yours (Oyserman and colleagues, 2004). If that's hard to picture, "When has a choice like this gone okay before?" is another way in, though we found no study that tested it.

Where your own worry goes

Chapter 1 covers where your worry can go instead of onto your teen. In the talk itself, watch for the quiet version: disappointment at the edges of a calm voice. A stuck teen hears it as a verdict on not having it figured out yet, and it makes thinking harder. Hand the worry to another adult, or write it down, so you can stay curious in the room.

Opening the first talk

Pick a time when it's just the two of you. Through the teen years, time with a parent in a family group fell off a lot, while one-on-one time fell off less (Lam and colleagues, 2012, 188 US families followed for seven years). The study counted time together, not talks. Open from a scene in a show you're watching, or anything else that's already in front of you, rather than a sit-down. In a randomized trial with 569 parents, those who practiced starting talks that way, along with listening skills like saying back what they heard and naming the feeling, raised more new topics with their kids, and nine months later the kids reported more new topics too. The topic was sexual health, not plans, and most of the kids were 14 or younger (Schuster and colleagues, 2008).

Say early that the decision is theirs. One way in: "No decisions today. I'm curious what you've been thinking about next year. It's your call, and I'm here to think it through with you if you want." Then name any part where you need a say, like the money. Before you offer help, ask what kind they want: "Do you want me to just listen, or do you want my take?" College students rated a parent's help with their feelings as less useful when they hadn't asked for it, at least when that parent rarely backed their independence (Newman and Davis, 2024). Offer a small choice about when, like now or this weekend, rather than asking "So what's the plan?" If your teen passes, let it drop for now.

How you react is the next talk

Across 32 studies, what teens chose to tell their parents had a stronger link with what parents knew about their lives than parents' questions did (Liu and colleagues, 2020). The studies were about everyday life rather than plans.

The way you take it this time shapes whether they come to you next time. In a study that followed 982 young people over three waves, parents' negative reactions predicted more secrecy, and positive reactions predicted more telling (Tilton-Weaver and colleagues, 2010). In a randomized experiment, 935 British teens aged 13 to 16 watched a video of a teen telling his mother something hard. When she listened well, looking at him, nodding and not getting distracted, the teens said they'd be more willing to tell that parent things in future (Weinstein and colleagues, 2021). They were rating imagined reactions to one mother and son on screen.

In the moment, thank them for telling you, even when it's news you didn't want. Say back what you heard before you respond: "So part of you wants to get out of here, and part of you is worried about the money. Did I get that right?" And name the feeling before you try to fix anything: "Makes sense this feels heavy."

Your words and tone count too. Students felt less free when a teacher's questions were really orders, like "Don't you think you should...?", and when "you should" and "you've got to" came up (Reeve and Jang, 2006, US college students playing teacher and student). When 1,000 British 14 and 15 year olds heard recordings of mothers, not their own, saying the same words in different tones, a warm, inviting tone drew the best reactions (Weinstein and colleagues, 2019). So swap a few words: "you should" becomes "one option is," and "Don't you think you should apply?" becomes "What do you think?"

And every so often, ask how it's landing: "Does it feel like I'm listening or pushing?" Across 313 studies, parents rated their own parenting more positively than their teens did, and fathers were no different from mothers (Hou and colleagues, 2020). Those were ratings of parenting in general, not of talks about plans, but your read on how things are going may be a little rosier than your teen's.

No study here tested thanking your teen, saying back what you heard or naming the feeling on its own. The last two were taught together with other skills in the trial under Opening the first talk (Schuster and colleagues, 2008).

Most of these studies used younger teens or college students. None of them watched a parent and a 17 to 19 year old talk about what comes after high school, so treat them as the closest evidence we have.

When a talk goes badly

Some talks will go badly, and time alone doesn't reliably mend a rough patch. In a Dutch study that followed teens from 16 to 20, warm, low-conflict relationships with parents went from 30% to 53% overall. But of the teens who described things at home as rough at 16, about a quarter described them as warm by 20 (Hadiwijaya and colleagues, 2017).

Be the first to come down. In filmed arguments between parents, mostly mothers, and 11 to 16 year olds, pairs where the teen was more often the one to calm down first had longer heated stretches, and longer ones went with the issue feeling unsettled (Moed and colleagues, 2015). That was one point in time, so it can't show that a parent calming down first shortens a fight. If it keeps heating up, stop, and say when you'll return to it: "Let's stop here. Can we pick this up in a couple of days?" Stopping and naming a time goes a step past that research, and we found no study that tested it. The day or two of waiting fits a 14-day diary study of US teens aged 13 to 17, in which a fight with a parent spilled over into the next day or two, including trouble at school (Timmons and Margolin, 2015). In those days, keep everyday contact warm and about other things, then bring it up again with something small, like one question.

If you were part of it going wrong, apologize plainly and stop there: "I'm sorry. I came at you too hard." Don't attach an ask. In a study of 347 French-speaking Canadian teens around 16, apologies that took responsibility went with teens feeling more respected and closer to the parent. In the study's experiment, a short "I apologize for what I did" worked as well as a longer one, and adding a "but" and the parent's reasons did no better than no apology at all (Robichaud and colleagues, 2025). The experiment used imagined apologies, and the work comes from one research team.

After months of pushing, "Leave me alone" in What you might be hearing shows how to start fresh. For these moves in five families, from the talk that went wrong to the plan they made for now, read Five families.

The job changed: manager, consultant, adviser

For years your job was to manage. You set the bedtime, signed the form, made sure the thing got done. Somewhere in high school that job winds down, and a parent who keeps managing an almost-adult tends to get tuned out. Michael Riera, in Uncommon Sense for Parents with Teenagers, argues that around adolescence kids effectively fire their parents as managers, and the parent's move is to take the demotion and become a consultant. You give up the control you used to have. What you keep is influence, and Riera's point is that it runs both ways: to have influence with them, they need to feel they have some with you (Riera, via CBS News).

Stixrud and Johnson, in The Self-Driven Child, describe a young person's sense of control as protective against stress, and make the case for the parent as a consultant who offers warmth and guidance while leaving the decision where it belongs. Baumrind's long line of work on parenting points the same way: warm and firm together, high on both, is consistently associated with stronger social competence and lower levels of problem behavior, and those links look quite similar across the ethnic groups the research studied (ERIC Digest ED427896). Warm and firm describes how you parent, not which path you point them toward. It supports a household expectation and a check-in date without the parent making the choice.

There's more time than it feels like. Laurence Steinberg, in Age of Opportunity, describes adolescence as running from about 10 to about 25. The next stage, the one this guide adds, is where you're headed: adult-to-adult adviser, someone your grown child calls because they want your read, not because they have to answer to you.

Hand things back on purpose

Getting unstuck is a skill, and a teen builds it by making the small decisions, not by watching you make them, even though you'd be done in half the time. Every so often, ask yourself: what am I still doing for them that they could do themselves now? Hand those jobs back one at a time, a little ahead of what feels comfortable, while the stakes are low and you're still close by.

Hold firm on a next step, not the path

You don't get to pick whether it's a job, a trade, the military, a gap year, a class at the community college, starting something of their own, a four-year school, or a plan that doesn't fit any of those, and trying to pick it is what breaks the trust the whole conversation runs on. What's fair to hold is a small, reversible next step and a date to talk about how it went. If the day comes at a bad moment, offer a day close by instead of dropping it: "Is Sunday better?" A written decision can still change later. The few steps that bind are the exception, so read those together first. You own the check-in. Your teen owns the decision and the steps between here and it. For a teen who can't decide, keep the step deliberately tiny: one conversation with someone who does the work, one afternoon shadowing, one form. A small step is one an anxious teen will actually say yes to. Chapter 4 has what to ask at the check-in.

Who owns what

One rule keeps a family steady through all of this: your young adult owns the decision, and they also own how much to bring the family into it. That second half means this works the same for a teen itching to move across the country and for one who chooses to stay close and build from home, and neither is the better answer. Watch the pull to read distance as growth. Research on adolescent detachment (Ryan and Lynch, 1989) found that pulling coldly away is linked to insecurity, not health, so a teen who chooses to stay near isn't behind, and a cold exit isn't a sign of growing up. Closeness and independence don't have to pull against each other: in Pew's 2024 survey of adults 18 to 34, 69% said a parent was about as involved in their daily life as they wanted.

Saying out loud who decides which part, like the path, the date or the money, can head off a fight about the wrong thing. Expect your teen to put more of it on their side than you do. In a study that followed 76 African American teens and their mothers for five years, teens came to see their personal decisions as their own call with a parent's input, while their mothers saw the same decisions as joint (Smetana and colleagues, 2004). In another study, parents in 201 US families followed for ten years said that by 17 to 20, most everyday decisions were shared or their teen's own (Wray-Lake and colleagues, 2010). Both studies were about everyday decisions, not what comes after high school.

All of this is background for thinking clearly, not a verdict on your family, and none of it says which path is right. When you and your teen want to work through it in order, the tool at /start takes you both through it together, at your teen's pace.

Where these facts come from (25 sources)

Every figure is dated and linked so you can check it at the source. Last reviewed October 2026.

1. Dietrich and Kracke (2009), Career-specific parental behaviors in adolescents' development, Journal of Vocational Behavior (accessed 2026-10-14)
2. Ahn, Plamondon and Ratelle (2023), Different ways to support and thwart autonomy: parenting profiles and adolescents' career decision-making, Journal of Family Psychology (accessed 2026-10-14)
3. Neipp, Beyebach, Nuñez & Martínez-González (2016), The effect of solution-focused versus problem-focused questions: A replication, Journal of Marital and Family Therapy 42(3), 525-535 (204 Spanish university students; randomized; answered in writing, alone)
4. Oyserman, Bybee, Terry & Hart-Johnson (2004), Possible selves as roadmaps, Journal of Research in Personality 38(2), 130-149 (160 US eighth graders; one school year; correlational)
5. Lam, McHale & Crouter (2012), Parent-child shared time from middle childhood to late adolescence: Developmental course and adjustment correlates, Child Development 83(6), 2089-2103 (188 two-parent US families; seven years of phone diaries; ages 8 to 18)
6. Schuster, Corona, Elliott, Kanouse, Eastman, Zhou & Klein (2008), Evaluation of Talking Parents, Healthy Teens, a new worksite based parenting programme to promote parent-adolescent communication about sexual health: Randomised controlled trial, BMJ 337, a308 (569 US parents of 6th to 10th graders; randomized; sexual-health topic)
7. Newman & Davis (2024), A helping hand isn't always so helpful: Parental autonomy support moderates the effectiveness of interpersonal emotion regulation for emerging adults, Emerging Adulthood 12(2), 201-213 (194 US college students; one point in time)
8. Liu, Chen & Brown (2020), Do parenting practices and child disclosure predict parental knowledge? A meta-analysis, Journal of Youth and Adolescence 49(1), 1-16 (32 studies of 10 to 18 year olds in 9 countries; everyday life, not plans)
9. Tilton-Weaver, Kerr, Pakalniskeine, Tokic, Salihovic & Stattin (2010), Open up or close down: How do parental reactions affect youth information management?, Journal of Adolescence 33(2), 333-346 (982 young people, three waves; correlational)
10. Weinstein, Huo & Itzchakov (2021), Parental listening when adolescents self-disclose: A preregistered experimental study, Journal of Experimental Child Psychology 209, 105178 (935 UK teens aged 13 to 16; randomized; reactions to a video)
11. Reeve & Jang (2006), What teachers say and do to support students' autonomy during a learning activity, Journal of Educational Psychology 98(1), 209-218 (72 pairs of US college students as teacher and student; correlational)
12. Weinstein, Vansteenkiste & Paulmann (2019), Listen to your mother: Motivating tones of voice predict adolescents' reactions to mothers, Developmental Psychology 55(12), 2534-2546 (1,000 UK teens aged 14 and 15; randomized; recorded voices)
13. Hou, Benner, Kim, Chen, Spitz, Shi & Beretvas (2020), Discordance in parents' and adolescents' reports of parenting: A meta-analysis and qualitative review, American Psychologist 75(3), 329-348 (313 studies; ages 10 to 20; parenting in general)
14. Hadiwijaya, Klimstra, Vermunt, Branje & Meeus (2017), On the development of harmony, turbulence, and independence in parent-adolescent relationships: A five-wave longitudinal study, Journal of Youth and Adolescence 46(8), 1772-1788 (392 Dutch teens followed from 16 to 20; the teens' own reports)
15. Moed, Gershoff, Eisenberg, Hofer, Losoya, Spinrad & Liew (2015), Parent-adolescent conflict as sequences of reciprocal negative emotion: Links with conflict resolution and adolescents' behavior problems, Journal of Youth and Adolescence 44(8), 1607-1622 (138 US parent and teen pairs, ages 11 to 16, mostly mothers; filmed; one point in time)
16. Timmons & Margolin (2015), Family conflict, mood, and adolescents' daily school problems: Moderating roles of internalizing and externalizing symptoms, Child Development 86(1), 241-258 (106 US teens aged 13 to 17 and their parents; 14-day diaries)
17. Robichaud, Mageau, Kil, McLaughlin, Comeau & Schumann (2025), Parental apologies as a potential determinant of adolescents' basic psychological needs satisfaction and frustration, Journal of Experimental Child Psychology 254, 106204 (347 French-speaking Canadian teens, average age 16.5; includes an experiment with imagined apologies)
18. Michael Riera, Uncommon Sense for Parents with Teenagers, reported by CBS News (accessed 2026-09-18)
19. William Stixrud & Ned Johnson, The Self-Driven Child (Penguin Random House) (accessed 2026-09-18)
20. ERIC Digest ED427896, Parenting Style and Its Correlates (drawing on Baumrind) (accessed 2026-09-18)
21. Here & Now (WBUR), interview with Laurence Steinberg on Age of Opportunity (2014-12-01)
22. Ryan & Lynch (1989), Emotional Autonomy versus Detachment, Child Development 60(2), 340-356, via ERIC (accessed 2026-09-18)
23. Pew Research Center (Jan 25, 2024), Parents, Young Adult Children and the Transition to Adulthood, young adults' relationship chapter (accessed 2026-09-18)
24. Smetana, Campione-Barr & Daddis (2004), Longitudinal development of family decision making: Defining healthy behavioral autonomy for middle-class African American adolescents, Child Development 75(5), 1418-1434 (76 US mothers and teens followed five years from about 13; everyday decisions)
25. Wray-Lake, Crouter & McHale (2010), Developmental patterns in decision-making autonomy across middle childhood and adolescence: European American parents' perspectives, Child Development 81(2), 636-651 (201 US families; parents reported at ages 9 to 20; everyday decisions)